956

230          EN  NL  ES  

Dear EU Leaders,

Donald Trump’s back, and he’s swinging harder than ever. His threat of 50% import tariffs on European goods by June 1, 2025, is a blatant attempt to bully the EU into submission. His playbook—trade wars, NATO ultimatums, and tech dominance—hasn’t changed, but the EU’s response must. The United States, under Trump’s erratic leadership, is no longer the indispensable ally it once claimed to be.

It’s a liability, a protectionist bully that underestimates Europe’s resolve. The upcoming NATO summit in the Netherlands is your chance to show Trump and his team that the EU can stand tall, independent, and unafraid. Here’s a bold, pragmatic strategy to slash Europe’s reliance on the U.S., neutralize Trump’s blackmail, and secure the EU’s economic, military, and geopolitical future. This isn’t about burning bridges—it’s about building a Europe that doesn’t bend to MAGA tantrums.

The U.S. Myth: Overrated and Overplayed

Trump’s America loves to tout its superiority—technological, military, economic—but let’s cut through the noise. The U.S. tech edge? It’s mostly hype, fueled by the cash of ad giants (Google, Meta, X) and retail behemoths (Amazon). Their AI and cloud dominance rely on scale, not genius. Intel’s chip industry is floundering, trailing Taiwan’s TSMC and South Korea’s Samsung. NVIDIA’s GPU empire? A lucky break from gaming cards that just happen to power AI models. Microsoft’s monopoly is a software stranglehold, not a technological marvel. Meanwhile, Europe boasts ASML, the world’s chip-making kingpin, BESI’s assembly process, and a booming drone sector fueled by Ukraine’s battlefield ingenuity. Add CERN, Airbus, Eurofighter, Saab, ESA, SAP, Capgemini to the mix, and it’s clear: the EU isn’t the junior partner Trump thinks it is.

The U.S. military umbrella under NATO? Overrated, too. The U.S. provides 70% of NATO’s muscle, but Europe’s “coalition of the willing”—France, Germany, Poland, the UK, and Ukraine—is stepping up fast. France and the UK have nuclear arsenals; the Netherlands could develop one if pushed. And let’s not forget energy: the U.S. supplies 45% of the EU’s LNG, but Qatar, Norway, and even Russia (yes, Russia) offer alternatives. Trump’s tariffs and threats are a wake-up call, not a death sentence. It’s time to flip the script.

Reciprocity with Teeth: Hitting Back at Trump’s Tariffs

Trump’s 50% tariff threat is a declaration of economic war. The EU can’t just absorb the blow—it must strike back, and hard. Here’s how to make Trump’s team sweat:

  • ASML and BESI Unleashed: The U.S. relies on ASML’s photolithography machines and BESI’s chip assembly tech to keep its semiconductor dreams alive. Europe should loosen export restrictions to China, letting Beijing’s chip industry surge while temporarily freezing U.S. access. This isn’t about cozying up to China—it’s about showing Trump that Europe holds the cards in the global chip race. The U.S. will cry foul, citing the Wassenaar Arrangement, but let’s be real: America’s track record of shredding treaties (Iran Deal, Paris Climate Accord, WHO) makes their complaints laughable. A targeted export pivot to China, under strict civilian-use conditions, will hit U.S. tech where it hurts.

  • Tax the Tech Titans: Google, Meta, and X (Musk’s pet project) rake in billions from European users while dodging accountability. Slap a 5-10% “digital sovereignty tax” on their ad revenues and data usage. The EU’s already a pro at regulation—GDPR and the Digital Markets Act set the stage. Funnel the proceeds into European AI (Mistral), cloud (GAIA-X), and chip production (Chips Act). This isn’t just revenge—it’s a down payment on tech independence. Trump’s cronies will howl, but they’ll see the EU means business.

These moves are reciprocal, not escalatory. Trump’s tariffs would gut European exports (18% of which go to the U.S.), so hitting back at his tech and chip lifelines is fair game. The EU’s economic clout—€2 trillion in U.S. investments and a massive consumer market—gives it leverage. Trump’s team will see the math: bullying Europe comes at a steep price.

Tesla’s Tumble: Let the Market Do the Talking

Elon Musk’s political antics have turned Tesla into a punching bag, but its decline isn’t just about his X rants. Chinese EV makers like BYD, NIO, and Xpeng are outpacing Tesla with better, cheaper cars—9.6 million units produced in 2024 compared to Tesla’s 1.8 million. In Europe, Tesla’s market share dropped to 13% in 2024, while BYD climbed to 8%. European brands like Volkswagen and Stellantis are hitting their stride, too. The EU can accelerate Tesla’s fall by slashing import tariffs on Chinese EVs (currently 9% extra) and boosting subsidies for European producers. This isn’t about punishing Musk—it’s about embracing competition. The U.S. market can’t save Tesla alone, and as its global share shrinks, America’s economic swagger takes a hit.

But don’t overplay the China card. The EU must protect its own EV industry with strategic investments in battery production (CATL, Northvolt) and trade deals with Asia (India, ASEAN) and Africa (AfCFTA). The Belt and Road Initiative—“the silk road”—opens new markets for European and Chinese EVs, bypassing the U.S. entirely. Trump’s protectionism will leave America isolated while Europe thrives on open trade.

Energy Independence: Ditch U.S. LNG, Embrace Alternatives

The U.S. supplies 45% of the EU’s LNG, a dependency born from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. But Europe has options. Qatar (15% of LNG imports) and Norway (25%) can fill the gap with long-term contracts. Offshore wind in the North Sea—especially above the Wadden Islands—could add 20 GW by 2030, slashing gas demand. Here’s the boldest play: use Russian gas as a bargaining chip. Offer Moscow a deal—return occupied Ukrainian territories (Donbas, Zaporizhzhia) and agree to a ceasefire in exchange for resuming gas exports via Nord Stream 2 or TurkStream. This isn’t about cozying up to Putin; it’s about outmaneuvering Trump. Cutting U.S. LNG ($50 billion annually) hits America’s wallet and shows Europe can play hardball. If peace talks stall, Qatar and Norway are ready backups. Either way, the EU’s energy future doesn’t run through Washington.

Defense: A European Powerhouse Without Uncle Sam

Trump’s NATO threats—pulling out or demanding more cash—are a tired act. The U.S. provides 70% of NATO’s muscle, but Europe’s “coalition of the willing” (France, Germany, Poland, the UK, Ukraine) is ready to step up. France and the UK have 515 nuclear warheads combined; the Netherlands could develop its own if pushed, leveraging expertise from TNO and TU Delft. Ukraine’s drone innovations—battle-tested against Russia—are a game-changer. The EU should formalize a Franco-British nuclear umbrella and fast-track joint projects like the Eurofighter and FCAS. Buying Russian S-500 air defense systems, as Turkey did with S-400s, is a wild card—technically feasible but politically dicey. Better to lean on European systems and Ukraine’s drone prowess.

The NATO summit in the Netherlands is the perfect stage to flex this muscle. Increase European contributions (Poland’s 4% GDP defense spending sets the pace) and shift decision-making to PESCO. The U.S. isn’t irrelevant yet—nuclear deterrence and logistics still matter—but it’s no longer indispensable. Trump’s team will see a Europe that doesn’t need babysitting.

Baltic Checkmate: Locking Russia Out

The Baltic Sea is Europe’s turf now, with Finland and Sweden in NATO and Denmark controlling the Øresund and Great Belt. A maritime blockade—sanctions on Russian shipping and European-led NATO drills—can choke Russia’s Baltic trade and navy without firing a shot. Forget Kaliningrad; it’s already boxed in. Targeting access at Denmark sends a louder message to Moscow and Washington: the EU doesn’t need U.S. carriers to dominate its backyard. This move, paired with cyber defenses against Russian retaliation, cements Europe’s geopolitical clout.

The Silk Road and Beyond: New Partners, New Power

Trump’s America is betting on isolationism, but the EU thrives on global trade. The Belt and Road Initiative opens markets in Asia and Africa—1.4 billion consumers via AfCFTA alone. New trade deals with India, ASEAN, and Canada (CETA) can replace the U.S. market (18% of EU exports). China’s a tricky partner, but selective cooperation—like ASML exports under civilian terms—keeps Beijing engaged without over-dependence. The EU’s cautious approach, unlike America’s hawkish China obsession, gives it room to maneuver. Protectionism will cost the U.S. dearly; Europe’s open markets will pay dividends.

The Russia Gambit: Peace for Gas?

Here’s the wildcard: a peace deal with Russia. Offer Putin a trade—full withdrawal from Ukrainian territories for resumed gas exports and economic access to Europe. This isn’t about trust; it’s about leverage. Russia’s economy craves EU markets, and a deal could sideline U.S. LNG while stabilizing Ukraine. If it fails, Qatar, Norway, and North Sea wind are ready. This move would make Trump’s team choke on their coffee—it shows Europe can rewrite the geopolitical script without Washington’s approval.

The Roadmap: Fast, Fierce, Feasible

  • Year 1-2: Hit back with a digital tax on U.S. tech giants and ASML exports to China. Slash tariffs on Chinese EVs, boost European producers, and sign trade deals with India, ASEAN, and Africa. Block the Baltic at Denmark with European-led NATO drills. Formalize a Franco-British nuclear umbrella and integrate Ukraine’s drones. Secure LNG from Qatar and Norway; dangle Russian gas as a peace incentive.
  • Year 3-10: Build GAIA-X, scale chip production (Chips Act), and make Africa a trade powerhouse. Develop FCAS, drones, and European intelligence to sideline the U.S. in NATO. Expand North Sea wind to kill gas dependence.

The Message to Trump

Trump will rage, but his staf will see the writing on the wall. Europe’s not a pawn—it’s a power. ASML, BESI, and tech taxes can cripple U.S. industries. Baltic dominance and Russian deals show Europe doesn’t need America’s military or gas. Chinese EVs and global trade routes prove the EU’s economic might. At the NATO summit, show Trump that his tariffs and threats only accelerate Europe’s rise. The U.S. can be a partner, but never again the boss. Lead boldly, and let Trump’s team scramble to keep up.

1042

 

And the winner is . . .

 

I assume that Prime Minister Theresa May will have big regrets about her snap elections. She almost desperately wanted a large majority in the House of Commons to show extensive public support and obtain a strong mandate for her Brexit strategy. After counting the votes, the dreamed majority was vaporized and the Tories are still the largest but without the overall desired power in the House.

Labour won but not enough to become the largest party so is still doomed to play the opposition role. Jeremy Corbyn was hailed as the man who brought Labour back on track but despite the strong campaign, his starting position was to weak to really be able to challenge the Conservatives for their leadership. Labour with Corbyn still hangs to much onto classic ideals. The party has been lucky that younger voters did not have an alternative. The Greens and LibDems are way too small to have serious impact so they only could not vote at all or choose strategically for Labour. 

Nicola Sturgeon, leader of the Scottish National Party (SNP), also overplayed her hand and saw to her stunning surprise that the Scots lost appetite to separate themselves from a Brexited-UK and  voters ran towards both the Tories and Labour. Although the last referendum was just a narrow "stay" victory, it was in the light of England still a member of the EU. Scotland would have gained more independent power in the EU but would still be close friends to its EU-neighbour England. Now the UK leaves the EU, the Scots obviously prefer a stay in the UK instead of a standalone position in the EU.

The LibDems lost severely and their leader, Nick Clegg, former deputy Prime Minister, even lost his seat in the House. They knew they had to pay the price for joining the Tories in a coalition government, but this slaughter was a bit unexpected. 

The TKIP, the anti-EU loudmouths of former leader Nigel Farage who as a tiny tiny minority was able to mobilize Brexit, was shred into pieces, zero seats in the House, and will most likely not overcome this loss ever again.

 

Every party will count their blessings and no doubt many arguments will pop up to explain the shallow outcome of a hung parliament. Of course the awful terrorist attacks are pointed to as the major disturbance in these elections and to some extent they are. However, lets be honest, terrorists are unfortunately getting too common to ignore them in a political arena. Additionally the whole meaning of Brexit was to close the UK borders in an attempt to minimize terrorist attacks and economic impact of a steady flow of immigration. The attacks, performed by people of which half of them have a British passport, proved that current immigration is only part of the problem. It's the "handling" of a multi-cultural society which  will never go away anymore. This world has become too small for that.

So, there we are. This 2017 UK general election delivered no real winners at all. It showed painfully that the current UK government is on its own. Internally with a damaged PM Theresa May and scattered political landscape with no real majorities. And internationally because May's Brexit strategy obviously did not gather supporting power from the people and leaves May with a weak negotiation position.

But as history shows, Brits will not easily admit wrong decisions so Brexit will continue, whatever the costs.

Rule, Britannia!

 

(thanks to Marian Kamensky for the awesome cartoon)